4.6
Knowledge and Skills Statement (Standard Cluster)
The student uses metacognitive skills to both develop and deepen comprehension of increasingly complex texts.
Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for English Language Arts and Reading
Cluster contents
Student Expectations in This Statement
4.6 is a knowledge and skills statement. These are the student expectations under it.
- 4.6.A
establish purpose for reading assigned and self-selected texts
- 4.6.B
generate questions about text before, during, and after reading to deepen understanding and gain information
- 4.6.C
make, correct, or confirm predictions using text features, characteristics of genre, and structures
- 4.6.D
create mental images to deepen understanding
- 4.6.E
make connections to personal experiences, ideas in other texts, and society
- 4.6.F
make inferences and use evidence to support understanding
- 4.6.G
evaluate details read to determine key ideas
- 4.6.H
synthesize information to create new understanding
- 4.6.I
monitor comprehension and make adjustments such as re-reading, using background knowledge, asking questions, and annotating when understanding breaks down.
Teacher's field guide
What This Cluster Means
What Students Need to Do
- Students set a purpose and actively track their thinking before, during, and after reading. They ask questions, predict, visualize, connect, infer, identify key ideas, and combine information across texts. When meaning breaks down, they notice the problem and choose a strategy to fix it.
What Mastery Looks Like
- Before reading, students name a clear purpose and preview the text. During reading, they record useful questions, predictions, connections, and evidence-based inferences. After reading, they identify key ideas, combine information across texts, and explain how they fixed confusion.
Common Misconceptions
- Students may treat predictions as guesses instead of using text clues. They may confuse synthesis with summary, make unrelated personal connections, or give inferences without evidence. Some keep reading when confused instead of using a repair strategy.
How to Assess It
- Give students two short texts on the same topic. Ask them to state a reading purpose, infer one idea with evidence, combine one detail from each text, and name a repair strategy.
Lesson moves
Ways to Teach It
Students sort sticky notes while reading paired texts into question, prediction, inference, connection, and fix-up columns, adding page evidence to each.
Ask students to write: What new understanding did you gain by reading both texts, and which details helped you form it?
Play Strategy Draw: teams draw a reread, annotate, question, or background knowledge card and use that strategy on a confusing paragraph.
Students compare a school lunch menu with a nutrition article, choose a meal, and support the choice with details from both sources.
Keep exploring
Related Standards
Turn this cluster into a lesson
Grade, subject, topic, and the complete cluster are prefilled. Create one free, no account needed.