Ready-to-use classroom activity

Tabletop Whiteboarding

Small groups work on whiteboard surfaces to solve problems, showing all work and explaining their process to the class.

Grade range

3rd Grade – 12th Grade

Works across

ScienceMathematics

Activity style

CollaborativeVisualAnalytical

Tabletop Whiteboarding

Small groups work on whiteboard surfaces to solve problems, showing all work and explaining their process to the class.

Example lesson: Fraction Operations (Mathematics - 4th Grade)

Materials

  • Small whiteboards or laminated poster board (one per group)
  • Dry erase markers (multiple colors per group)
  • Erasers or tissues
  • Fraction problem cards at different levels
  • Fraction model templates (number lines, area models)
  • Solution checking guide
  • Process recording sheet for final answers
  • Document camera for sharing solutions

Preparation

Create sets of fraction operation problems at varying levels of difficulty (addition, subtraction, mixed numbers). Prepare whiteboard surfaces for each small group – either commercial whiteboards or laminated poster board. Develop a presentation format for groups to share their solutions. Create a process recording sheet for students to track final answers.

Run the activity

  1. Introduction to tabletop whiteboarding (5 minutes):
  2. Explain the collaborative problem-solving process
  3. Set expectations: everyone participates, all work is shown, process is as important as answer
  4. Demonstrate how to organize the whiteboard space to show thinking
  5. Establish norms for group work and marker sharing
  6. Fraction concept review (8-10 minutes):
  7. Quick review of fraction operations to be practiced
  8. Demonstrate strategies for solving fraction problems:
  9. Finding common denominators
  10. Using visual models to represent operations
  11. Simplifying answers
  12. Model solving one problem using the whiteboard format
  13. Group formation and roles (3-5 minutes):
  14. Arrange students in groups of 3-4
  15. Assign or have groups select roles:
  16. Process Manager: guides group through steps
  17. Recorder: writes on whiteboard
  18. Strategy Suggester: proposes approaches
  19. Presenter: explains to class
  20. Roles can rotate with each new problem
  21. First problem set (10-12 minutes):
  22. Distribute first level fraction problem to each group
  23. Groups work collaboratively on whiteboards:
  24. Write the problem at the top
  25. Show all steps of the solution process
  26. Use visual models to explain thinking
  27. Circle final answer
  28. Teacher circulates, observing group dynamics and mathematical thinking
  29. Quick presentations (5-7 minutes):
  30. Select 2-3 groups to briefly present their solutions
  31. Use document camera to display whiteboards
  32. Presenters explain process and strategies used
  33. Class asks clarifying questions
  34. Second problem set (10-12 minutes):
  35. Distribute more challenging fraction problems
  36. Groups repeat whiteboard solving process
  37. Encourage use of multiple strategies or representations
  38. Take photo of completed work before erasing
  39. Gallery walk (8 minutes):
  40. Groups display final whiteboards around room
  41. Students tour solutions with recording sheets
  42. Note different strategies and approaches
  43. Identify especially clear explanations or efficient methods
  44. Reflection: Groups discuss what strategies worked best and how the visual whiteboard format helped their thinking.

Differentiation

Provide tiered problem sets so groups work at appropriate challenge levels. For struggling groups, include fraction model templates or hints. For advanced groups, add word problems or fractions with unlike denominators. For English learners, provide visual models and encourage drawing to demonstrate understanding.

Assessment

Observe group participation patterns and note which students take leadership roles. Evaluate whiteboards for mathematical accuracy, clear process steps, and appropriate models. Listen to presentations for evidence of conceptual understanding beyond procedural knowledge.